By Agnes Jäger, Doris Penka
This quantity specializes in the interaction of syntactic and semantic elements in language switch. The contributions draw on information from a variety of Indo-European languages and handle the query of ways syntactic and semantic swap are associated and even if either are ruled via comparable constraints, ideas and systematic mechanisms. the quantity will entice students in ancient linguistics and formal theories of syntax and semantics.
Read Online or Download Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface PDF
Best semantics books
Littlewood-Paley thought is a vital software of Fourier research, with functions and connections to PDEs, sign processing, and likelihood. It extends a few of the merits of orthogonality to occasions the place orthogonality doesn’t fairly make experience. It does so through letting us keep watch over convinced oscillatory countless sequence of services by way of countless sequence of non-negative services.
This can be a kind of collections of classics that simply will get misplaced one of the multitude of books at the subject, however it continues to be the best i have stumble upon. many of the classics are right here, Davidson's 'Truth and Meaning', Lewis' 'General Semantics', Kamp's unique presentation of DRT, Groenendijk & Stokhof's 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Barwise & Perry's 'Situations and Attitudes', Barwise & Cooper's 'Generalized Quantifiers and ordinary Language' and the tough to come back through (except within the ridiculously dear 'Themes from Kaplan') 'Demonstratives' via Kaplan, to say a couple of.
Comprises revised papers from a September 1996 symposium which supplied a discussion board for synchronically and diachronically orientated students to interchange rules and for American and eu cognitive linguists to confront representatives of other instructions in ecu structural semantics. Papers are in sections on theories and types, descriptive different types, and case stories, and think about components similar to cognitive and structural semantics, diachronic prototype semantics, synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative procedure, and intensifiers as ambitions and resources of semantic switch.
This quantity specializes in the interaction of syntactic and semantic components in language swap. The contributions draw on information from quite a few Indo-European languages and tackle the query of ways syntactic and semantic switch are associated and no matter if either are ruled by means of related constraints, ideas and systematic mechanisms.
Additional resources for Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface
It is therefore not productive to draw a rigid dividing line between lexical and propositional semantics in diachronic work. The application of modern compositional theories of meaning can be instrumental in pursuing a better understanding of semantic change. A number of insights gained from grammaticalization theory have been captured in recent diachronic work within the generative framework (cf. g. Roberts and Roussou 2003; van Gelderen 2004, 2011; and Section 4 below). Generative syntactic analyses are usually coupled with a semantic mechanism of “bleaching” or “weakening”, which has been first accounted for in a formal framework by von Fintel (1995).
G. modal properties), “logical” being defined as invariant under isomorphism (Roberts and Roussou 2003: 218–224). Directional change in grammaticalization phenomena has been seen as “uniformly generalizing” also by Kiparsky (2012). Breitbarth (this volume) interprets the semantic change taking place in grammaticalization as “semantic abstraction”. , potentially active, features; semantic abstraction is understood as loss of features associated with lexical items. In her case study on English should, she identifies a mechanism of abstraction from posteriority to hypothetical potentiality; as a consequence of semantic abstraction, movement to higher positions becomes possible.
Roberts (1993), with his “Least Effort Strategy”, formalizes simplicity in terms of “shortest derivation”: “Representations assigned to sentences of the input to acquisition should be such that they contain the set of the shortest possible chains (consistent with (a) principles of grammars, (b) other aspects of the trigger experience)” (1993: 156). This formulation points to a central tenet of generative historical syntax, which clearly has strong ties with analogous synchronic considerations on representational and derivational economy (see Hornstein, Nunes, and Grohmann 2005: 330–365 for a survey): movement is costly, and dispreferred in acquisition.