By Raphael Volz, Steffen Staab, Boris Motik (auth.), Stefano Spaccapietra, Elisa Bertino, Sushil Jajodia, Roger King, Dennis McLeod, Maria E. Orlowska, Leon Strous (eds.)
The LNCS magazine on facts Semantics is dedicated to the presentation of remarkable paintings that, in a single means or one other, addresses study and improvement on concerns concerning info semantics. in accordance with the hugely obvious booklet platform Lecture Notes in machine technological know-how, this new magazine is broadly disseminated and on hand all over the world.
The scope of the magazine levels from theories aiding the formal definition of semantic content material to leading edge domain-specific functions of semantic wisdom. The magazine addresses researchers and complex practitioners engaged on the semantic internet, interoperability, cellular info providers, facts warehousing, wisdom illustration and reasoning, conceptual database modeling, ontologies, and synthetic intelligence.
Read Online or Download Journal on Data Semantics II PDF
Best semantics books
Littlewood-Paley thought is a necessary instrument of Fourier research, with purposes and connections to PDEs, sign processing, and likelihood. It extends a few of the advantages of orthogonality to occasions the place orthogonality doesn’t relatively make feel. It does so via letting us keep an eye on yes oscillatory countless sequence of capabilities by way of endless sequence of non-negative capabilities.
This is often a type of collections of classics that simply will get misplaced one of the multitude of books at the subject, however it remains to be the best i have stumble upon. lots of the classics are the following, Davidson's 'Truth and Meaning', Lewis' 'General Semantics', Kamp's unique presentation of DRT, Groenendijk & Stokhof's 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Barwise & Perry's 'Situations and Attitudes', Barwise & Cooper's 'Generalized Quantifiers and average Language' and the not easy to return by means of (except within the ridiculously dear 'Themes from Kaplan') 'Demonstratives' by means of Kaplan, to say a couple of.
Includes revised papers from a September 1996 symposium which supplied a discussion board for synchronically and diachronically orientated students to switch principles and for American and eu cognitive linguists to confront representatives of alternative instructions in eu structural semantics. Papers are in sections on theories and versions, descriptive different types, and case reviews, and look at parts similar to cognitive and structural semantics, diachronic prototype semantics, synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative approach, and intensifiers as ambitions and assets of semantic swap.
This quantity makes a speciality of the interaction of syntactic and semantic elements in language switch. The contributions draw on facts from a number of Indo-European languages and handle the query of the way syntactic and semantic swap are associated and even if either are ruled by way of related constraints, ideas and systematic mechanisms.
Additional info for Journal on Data Semantics II
Journal of the ACM, 42:741–843, 1995.  V. Kuchenhoﬀ. On the eﬃcient computation of the diﬀerence betwen consecutive database states. In C. Delobel, M. Kifer, and Y. Masunaga, editors, Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, volume 566 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 478–502, Munich, Germany, December 1991. Springer.  L. Liu, C. Pu, and W. Tang. Continual queries for internet scale event-driven information delivery. IEEE TKDE, 11(4), 1999.  A.
In the yale bib ontology, booktitle’s domain is Publication and its range is Literal, which can be taken to be the same class as String. However, yale bib’s booktitle domain is Publication. The assertion that publication P has booktitle S means that P was published in a conference proceedings or anthology, and that it is this proceedings or collection that has S as its title. Another reason for complicated semantic diﬀerences is that they can be inherited from those between basic concepts, such as time, space etc.
S. Spaccapietra et al. ): Journal on Data Semantics II, LNCS 3360, pp. 35–57, 2004. c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 36 Dejing Dou, Drew McDermott, and Peishen Qi More and more ontologies are being developed  as formal underpinnings for RDF-based data. An obvious desideratum of this movement is that two ontologies should not cover the same area; instead, those interested in formalizing descriptions in that area should agree on a standard set of concepts. However, this goal cannot always be met, for a variety of reasons.