By Molly Diesing
Indefinites investigates the connection among the syntactic and semantic representations of sentences in the framework of generative grammar. It proposes a way of bearing on government-binding conception, that is basically syntactic, to the semantic conception of noun word interpretation constructed through Kamp and Heim, and introduces a unique mapping set of rules that describes the relation among syntactic configurations and logical representations.Diesing specializes in the matter of deriving logical representations from syntactic representations of sentences, with an emphasis on problems with quantification and the translation of indefinites. the 2 relevant questions addressed are the potential semantic interpretations of indefinites and quantificational noun words, and the position performed by way of syntactic illustration in deriving the semantic illustration of noun words. The mapping set of rules used is utilized to derive the logical representations of indefinites to a variety of syntactic and semantic phenomena in German together with scrambling, VP-deletion, and extraction from NP.Molly Diesing is Assistant Professor of Linguistics and Assistant study Social Scientist in Cognitive technology on the college of Arizona, Tucson.
Read or Download Indefinites (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs) PDF
Best semantics books
Littlewood-Paley idea is a vital instrument of Fourier research, with purposes and connections to PDEs, sign processing, and chance. It extends many of the advantages of orthogonality to occasions the place orthogonality doesn’t fairly make feel. It does so by way of letting us keep an eye on convinced oscillatory limitless sequence of services by way of limitless sequence of non-negative services.
This can be a type of collections of classics that simply will get misplaced one of the multitude of books at the subject, however it remains to be the best i have come upon. many of the classics are right here, Davidson's 'Truth and Meaning', Lewis' 'General Semantics', Kamp's unique presentation of DRT, Groenendijk & Stokhof's 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Barwise & Perry's 'Situations and Attitudes', Barwise & Cooper's 'Generalized Quantifiers and ordinary Language' and the demanding to come back by means of (except within the ridiculously pricey 'Themes from Kaplan') 'Demonstratives' through Kaplan, to say a number of.
Includes revised papers from a September 1996 symposium which supplied a discussion board for synchronically and diachronically orientated students to replace principles and for American and ecu cognitive linguists to confront representatives of other instructions in ecu structural semantics. Papers are in sections on theories and versions, descriptive different types, and case stories, and view parts equivalent to cognitive and structural semantics, diachronic prototype semantics, synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative approach, and intensifiers as pursuits and resources of semantic switch.
This quantity makes a speciality of the interaction of syntactic and semantic elements in language switch. The contributions draw on info from various Indo-European languages and handle the query of ways syntactic and semantic swap are associated and no matter if either are ruled by way of related constraints, rules and systematic mechanisms.
Additional info for Indefinites (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
A second case of movement in German that shows a contrast between the two subject positions is the split-topic construction. This construction has been the subject of much recent work (see, for example, Van Riemsdijk 1989, Fanselow 1988a, Tappe 1989, and Bhatt 1990). , topicalization) from an NP has taken place, with the result that a portion of the NP has been fronted to the "topic" position preceding the finite verb and a determiner is left stranded in the base position (for specific arguments that this construction does indeed show properties characteristic of movement, see Van Riemsdijk 1989).
What are for dogs nervous c. Was sind für Kinder ungezogen? what are for children naughty (52) a. Trombonisten sind viele heiter. trombonists are many cheerful b. Hunde sind viele nervös. dogs are many nervous c. Kinder sind viele ungezogen. children are many naughty The extractions in the sentences in (51) and (52) are all rather awkward (if not downright ungrammatical), as would be expected if the subjects could only appear in the outer subject position from which extraction is prohibited. 39 40 Finally, these predicates are also generally unacceptable in there-insertion contexts: (53) a.
C. There are pumpkins visible on the vine. (49) a. *There are carrots nutritious. b. *There are chili peppers spicy. c. *There are pumpkins heavy. In the following sections I will use these tests as well as others to examine some other predicate types that might be regarded as problematic for the approach I have taken. The problematic cases fall into a number of different semantic categories, which I will consider in turn. 1 Psychological States Terms denoting psychological states of emotion such as angry, cheerful, obnoxious, nervous, and nasty might intuitively seem to be stage-level predicates in that they describe transitory states.