By Andreas Blank
Comprises revised papers from a September 1996 symposium which supplied a discussion board for synchronically and diachronically orientated students to switch principles and for American and eu cognitive linguists to confront representatives of other instructions in eu structural semantics. Papers are in sections on theories and types, descriptive different types, and case experiences, and think about parts akin to cognitive and structural semantics, diachronic prototype semantics, synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative technique, and intensifiers as ambitions and assets of semantic swap.
Read Online or Download Historical Semantics and Cognition PDF
Best semantics books
Littlewood-Paley concept is a vital software of Fourier research, with functions and connections to PDEs, sign processing, and chance. It extends a number of the advantages of orthogonality to events the place orthogonality doesn’t rather make experience. It does so via letting us keep watch over sure oscillatory countless sequence of services by way of countless sequence of non-negative capabilities.
This can be a kind of collections of classics that simply will get misplaced one of the multitude of books at the subject, however it remains to be the best i have come upon. many of the classics are right here, Davidson's 'Truth and Meaning', Lewis' 'General Semantics', Kamp's unique presentation of DRT, Groenendijk & Stokhof's 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Barwise & Perry's 'Situations and Attitudes', Barwise & Cooper's 'Generalized Quantifiers and ordinary Language' and the demanding to come back through (except within the ridiculously dear 'Themes from Kaplan') 'Demonstratives' through Kaplan, to say a couple of.
Comprises revised papers from a September 1996 symposium which supplied a discussion board for synchronically and diachronically orientated students to interchange rules and for American and ecu cognitive linguists to confront representatives of alternative instructions in eu structural semantics. Papers are in sections on theories and versions, descriptive different types, and case experiences, and think about parts reminiscent of cognitive and structural semantics, diachronic prototype semantics, synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative process, and intensifiers as pursuits and assets of semantic swap.
This quantity specializes in the interaction of syntactic and semantic elements in language swap. The contributions draw on info from a variety of Indo-European languages and tackle the query of the way syntactic and semantic swap are associated and even if either are ruled by means of related constraints, rules and systematic mechanisms.
Extra info for Historical Semantics and Cognition
What goes into a concept? Coseriu (1990: 261) - rightly - criticises the view that concepts might be "imagenes de las clases" mental representations ("pictures") of categories. A crucial notion of Cognitive Grammar (Langacker 1987: 183-185) is that the meaning of an expression involves the~'profIling" (or designation) of an entity, against backiCoW}d assumptIOns. ) The (by now) classic example is the word hypotenuse (Fillmore 1985). The word designates a straight line, no more, no less. A hypotenuse, Cognitive Semantics and Structural Semantics 39 however, is categorised (recognised) as such, in virtue of the fact that the straight line functions as part of a non-designated (non-profiled) entity, namely, a right-angled triangle.
Would not this fact, of itself, guarantee the speaker's full mastery of the word? Values and contrasts at the level of signification need play no role whatsoever in a speaker's performance. In Structural Semantics, however, the unity of meanings at the level of signification is a logical necessity, rather than an empirical matter. Coseriu (1977: 8-10) writes that meaning variants can be derived from meaning invariants (significations), but not vice versa; it is only on the basis of unitary meanings that meaning variants can be established at all (Coseriu 1990: 270).
This was the principal theoretical import of Berlin and Kay's (1969) work on colour categories. Essentially, Berlin and Kay demonstrated for a semantic domain (colour) the same kinds of universal constraints that Jakobson (1968) had claimed for phonology. Tenninology, however, is far from unifonn. g. Searle 1980, Bierwisch 1981, Kirsner 1993, Wunderlich 1993). Although these approaches may differ in their details (especially concerning the manner in which "linguistic" meanings are represented and get projected onto encyclopedic meanings), a common theme is the assumption that linguistic meanings are unitary, clearly-defmed entities, which lack the rich detail derived from experience of the world.