By Daniel Fox
In economic climate and Semantic Interpretation, Danny Fox investigates the relevance of rules of optimization (economy) to the interface among syntax and semantics. aiding the view that grammar is specific by way of economic climate issues, Fox argues for varied economic system stipulations that constrain the program of "covert" operations. between different issues, he argues that syntactic operations that don't have an effect on phonology can't observe except they impact the semantic interpretation of a sentence. This place has a few results for the structure of grammar. for instance, it means that the modularity assumption, in accordance with which a language's syntax has to be characterised independently of its semantics, should be revised. one other end result matters new solutions to the query of precisely the place within the syntactic derivation a few of the constraints on interpretation apply.Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 35Copublished with the MIT operating Papers in Linguistics sequence.
Read Online or Download Economy and Semantic Interpretation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs) PDF
Similar semantics books
Littlewood-Paley thought is an important instrument of Fourier research, with purposes and connections to PDEs, sign processing, and chance. It extends the various merits of orthogonality to events the place orthogonality doesn’t quite make experience. It does so by way of letting us keep an eye on yes oscillatory limitless sequence of features by way of countless sequence of non-negative features.
This is often a kind of collections of classics that simply will get misplaced one of the multitude of books at the subject, however it remains to be the most effective i have stumble upon. lots of the classics are the following, Davidson's 'Truth and Meaning', Lewis' 'General Semantics', Kamp's unique presentation of DRT, Groenendijk & Stokhof's 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Barwise & Perry's 'Situations and Attitudes', Barwise & Cooper's 'Generalized Quantifiers and traditional Language' and the demanding to return through (except within the ridiculously dear 'Themes from Kaplan') 'Demonstratives' by means of Kaplan, to say a couple of.
Comprises revised papers from a September 1996 symposium which supplied a discussion board for synchronically and diachronically orientated students to switch rules and for American and eu cognitive linguists to confront representatives of alternative instructions in eu structural semantics. Papers are in sections on theories and types, descriptive different types, and case experiences, and think about components equivalent to cognitive and structural semantics, diachronic prototype semantics, synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative method, and intensifiers as goals and assets of semantic swap.
This quantity makes a speciality of the interaction of syntactic and semantic components in language switch. The contributions draw on info from a variety of Indo-European languages and tackle the query of the way syntactic and semantic switch are associated and even if either are ruled by means of comparable constraints, rules and systematic mechanisms.
Extra resources for Economy and Semantic Interpretation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
QL is totally optional and (by Scope Economy) is allowed to apply only when it has semantic effects. For this reason QL, like QR, can yield inverse scope from (9), but not from (10). 10 Scope Economy also distinguishes the sentences in (15) from the sentences in (17). QL can move the subject under the intensional verb in sentences like (15) but not in sentences like (17) (where QL would be semantically vacuous). 10. Given the option of QL (or given another mechanism for scope reconstruction; see chapter 5), it is very tempting to suggest that optional QR does not exist (see Kitahara 1994, Pica and Snyder 1995, Hornstein 1995) and that the restrictions imposed by Scope Economy are relevant only for QL.
When a QP is not a sister of a one-place predicate, I assume (again with Heim and Kratzer) that it must move by QR to a clause-denoting expression (type t)4 and that that movement forms a one-place predicate (through l-abstraction over the position of the trace). In order to predict the generalization in (3), I would like to add two economy conditions to the system described above. One condition (which 4. This assumption is not crucial for anything I say in this chapter. However, I believe that it becomes crucial once ACD is taken into account.
Chapters 5 and 6 combine material from Fox 1995a with material from Fox 1999. They also contain a new argument in favor of the conclusions that I draw in chapter 2. Page xvii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book is the result of five years of work. Much has happened to me during this time, and many people have made an impact on the way things turned out. I am especially indebted to my thesis supervisors: Noam Chomsky, Kai von Fintel, Irene Heim, and David Pesetsky. They have all been extremely generous with their time, and were a source of encouragement and support.